Gulf War Veterans and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

About Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is a debilitating and complex disorder characterized by overwhelming fatigue that is not improved by bed rest and that may be worsened by physical or mental activity.  CFS may have both physical and psychiatric manifestations. For VA purposes, a diagnosis of CFS must meet both of the following criteria:

  1. New onset of debilitating fatigue that is severe enough to reduce or impair average daily activity below 50% of the patient’s pre-illness activity level for a period of 6 months, and;
  1. Other clinical conditions that may produce similar symptoms must be excluded by thorough evaluation, based on history, physical examination, and appropriate laboratory tests.

In addition to the above two criteria, a diagnosis of CFS must meet and describe six or more of the following ten criteria in detail:

  1. Acute onset of the condition
  2. Low grade fever
  3. Nonexudative pharyngitis
  4. Palpable or tender cervical or axillary lymph nodes
  5. Generalized muscle aches or weakness
  6. Fatigue lasting 24 hours or longer after exercise
  7. Headaches (of a type, severity, or patter that is different from headaches in the premorbid state).
  8. Migratory joint pains
  9. Neuropsychologic symptoms
  10. Sleep disturbance

As you can see, symptoms of CFS affect several body systems and veterans with CFS often function at a substantially lower level of activity than they were capable of before they became ill. There is no identifiable cause of CFS, and there are no tests to diagnose CFS. Additionally, CFS closely resembles neurasthenia, neurocirculatory asthenia, fibrositis, or fibromyalgia. Because of the complexity of the disease and its symptoms, veterans should make sure their doctors take the time to rule out other conditions.

Making a CFS Claim

All veterans who have served in Southwest Asia since August 2, 1990 are entitled to presumptive service connection for certain medically unexplained chronic multi-symptom illnesses such as CFS. The VA regulation on presumptive service connection for CFS can be found here. The regulation provides that if a veteran qualifies as a Persian Gulf War veteran and develops CFS (or another medically unexplained chronic illness), the veteran will be entitled to compensation benefits, so long as the condition first became manifest during the veteran’s active service in the Southwest Asia theater of operations, or became manifest to a degree of 10% or more since the veteran’s return from active duty in Southwest Asia.

The most challenging part of a CFS claim is usually proving that you have CFS. When submitting a claim for CFS, be sure to submit medical evidence stating that you have complained of your symptoms to a medical professional, sought treatment for it, and have a diagnosis of CFS. Special efforts and inquiries may be necessary when obtaining medical evidence in these types of claims because of the difficulties involved with determining whether or not a diagnosis has been established.

Lay evidence, such as buddy statements, take on great importance in claims for a medically unexplained chronic multi-symptom illness such as CFS. These statements should describe the veteran’s disability pattern and also describe the changes in the veteran’s appearance, physical abilities, and mental or emotional status. Additionally, it is important to gather evidence such as any time lost from work and any attempts to seek medical treatment for the disability pattern.

There is a relatively low threshold for requesting a VA medical exam for a CFS claim. For example, even if there is no medical evidence that the veteran has previously been treated for their disability pattern and the only significant evidence is the veteran’s own statement describing his problems, a VA examination is still warranted.

Evaluation of a CFS Claim

CFS is rated under diagnostic code 6354. The VA’s rating schedule for CFS describes the condition as “debilitating fatigue, cognitive impairments (such as inability to concentrate, forgetfulness, confusion), or a combination of other signs and symptoms which:

  • Wax and wane but result in period of incapacitation of at least one but less than two weeks total duration per year, or: symptoms controlled by continuous medication. – 10% rating assigned
  • Are nearly constant and restrict daily activities by less than 25% of the pre-illness level, or; which wax and wane, resulting in periods of incapacitation of at least two weeks but less than four weeks total duration per year. – 20% rating assigned
  • Are nearly constant and restrict daily activities to 50-75% of the pre-illness level, or; which wax and wane, resulting in periods of incapacitation of at least four weeks but less than six weeks total duration per year. – 40% rating assigned
  • Are nearly constant and restrict daily activities to less than 50% of the pre-illness level, or; which wax and wane, resulting in periods of incapacitation of at least six weeks total duration per year. – 60% rating assigned
  • Are nearly constant and so severe as to restrict routine daily activities almost completely and which may occasionally preclude self-care. – 100% rating assigned

If you have established service connection for your CFS claim and received a rating for it, don’t stop there. The VA often makes mistakes when assigning a rating to a service-connected condition so it is important to carefully review your rating decisions and rating code sheets to determine if the evaluation of your CFS was done correctly.

Author Anne Thorn, Hill & Ponton, P.A. Attorney

Evidence Blue Water Veterans Need to Prove a Current Disability for VA Benefits

If you are a Blue Water veteran who is hoping to be awarded service connection for a condition caused by Agent Orange exposure due to the expected changes to VA law, you need to be aware of some of the particularities of VA law which may have an effect on your claim.  The very first step in proving a claim for VA benefits may seem like an obvious one, but it is very important, and like many aspects of VA law, can often be complicated due to the nature of VA regulations. Today we are going to discuss the first element of service connection – existence of a current disability – and what evidence is needed to best support your claim.

The first distinction that is important to make is the VA compensation benefits are only available to veterans who have current disabilities, and a veteran is not eligible for benefits simply because he or she contracted a disease or was injured in service. Along those same lines, proving exposure to Agent Orange in the Vietnam War or to environmental hazards in the Persian Gulf War alone is not sufficient to receive benefits. The veteran must be able to prove that he or she has a current disability, or current disabling residuals, in order to be eligible for VA benefits.

One issue many veterans struggle with is that the VA will not typically pay benefits to veterans who have pain that is not attributable to any particular diagnosis (with the exception of veterans who are suffering from “Gulf War Syndrome”). For that reason, it is important to try and get a diagnosis from a doctor which encompasses all symptoms you are experiencing, including pain. But note, if a veteran is able to show competent evidence of persistent or recurrent pain, that may trigger that VA’s duty to assist by scheduling a C&P examination to determine whether a current disability exists. Therefore, even if you are unable to find a doctor who can offer a diagnosis, it is still important to provide the VA with evidence that you have been suffering from persistent and recurrent pain through medical records (VA or private) or even statements from friends or family members who have witnessed your pain.

It is important to remember that the VA requires “competent” evidence of the existence of a current disability. VA regulations define competent medical evidence as: “evidence provided by a person who is qualified through education, training, or experience to offer medical diagnoses, statements, or opinions. Competent medical evidence may also mean statements conveying sound medical principles found in medical treatises. It would also include statements contained in authoritative writings such as medical and scientific articles and research reports or analyses.” What this means is that the diagnosis of a current disability must almost always be made by a medical professional or some other person with specialized knowledge, education, experience, or training that would qualify them to give such diagnosis.

On their own, statements from friends or family members will almost never be considered medical evidence of a current disability, but as noted above, they may trigger the VA’s duty to assist by scheduling the veteran for a C&P examination. However, there are some situations in which a lay person (meaning a non-medical professional in this situation) is competent to diagnose a condition, for instance, varicose veins or a broken leg. In order for lay evidence of a medical diagnosis to be given any weight by the VA, the lay person must be competent to identify the medical condition (such as the appearance of varicose veins or a broken leg), the lay person must be reporting a contemporaneous medical diagnosis, and the lay statement must support a later diagnosis by a medical professional.

As you can see, although there are other ways to prove existence of a current disability, the best evidence is always going to be a medical diagnosis, but other evidence such as private or VA medical records of recent treatment or examinations, letters or written statements from physicians, or service medical records may be helpful in establishing existence of a current disability as well, and will certainly be necessary for establishing the other elements of service connection and later, arguing for the highest rating possible based on your symptoms.

Author Heather Staskiel, Hill & Ponton Attorney

Diabetes Mellitus II – How It Made It’s Way into the List of Presumptives

One of the most common manifestations of Agent Orange in Vietnam veterans is Type 2 diabetes, also referred to as Diabetes Mellitus. In fact, over 270,000 Vietnam veterans receive disability pay for Type 2 diabetes. This does not even include Vietnam veterans who are not receiving disability benefits for this condition. According to the VA, there are approximately 7.2 million Vietnam veterans in the US today. That means that barely 3.8% of the Vietnam veteran population today is receiving benefits for Type 2 Diabetes!

Type 2 Diabetes is the most common form of diabetes and used to be referred to as “adult-onset” diabetes because it is often diagnosed later in life. This condition is caused by the body’s inability to process sugar properly. When we eat, our metabolism converts the food into energy. The pancreas produces a hormone called insulin, which aids in the food conversion process. Insulin triggers the cells in the liver and in the muscle tissue to absorb sugar from the blood. If the body does not respond to insulin properly, the sugar cannot be used in the right way, causing the blood sugar levels to rise. The pancreas can compensate for this temporarily by producing more insulin. But before long the pancreas will not be able to keep up, and blood sugar levels will start to rise.

What makes Type 2 Diabetes different from Type 1 Diabetes is that, with Diabetes II, the pancreas produces a sufficient amount of insulin but the body has stopped responding to that particular hormone. This is what doctors refer to as “insulin resistance”. To treat this condition, doctors prescribe insulin tablets or injections, or other medications.

Type 2 Diabetes is prevalent not only just among veterans, but among a large portion of the US population. Research has identified many factors that contribute to diabetes, including:

  • Being overweight and not getting enough physical exercise
  • Smoking
  • A low-fiber, high-fat and sugary diet
  • Some medications that affect the body’s sugar metabolism
  • Genetic factors

Because Diabetes Mellitus II is a widespread issue among Americans, particularly in the older populations (65 and up), and because there are so many risk factors, the VA dragged their feet for years before finally adding Diabetes Mellitus II to the list of conditions that are presumed to be related to service. Having added Type 2 diabetes to the original list of conditions being considered in 1991, it was not until 1999 that the Institute of Medicine deemed it probable that veterans who were exposed to Agent Orange in Vietnam may have a higher risk of developing diabetes than if they had not been exposed to the herbicide in the first place.

The Institute of Medicine actually had a few good reasons for taking so long to make this determination. While present-day statistics make it blatantly obvious that Agent Orange was the cause of diabetes in Vietnam veterans today, this was not quite so obvious to the researchers in 1991 or even in 2000. In fact, the statistics then nowhere near supported this link. Consider the US population back in 1991. The Vietnam generation was still young. In 1991, an average Vietnam veteran who enlisted in 1970 (the middle of the Vietnam War) at the age of 20 would be 40 years old. On average, Type 2 diabetes is diagnosed at age 65 and older. So in 1991, there was no reference point to use as a study because very few Vietnam veterans at the time were old enough to be diagnosed with this condition in the first place. In 2000, the average Vietnam veteran would have been 50, which is still well below the typical age of diagnosis. In the 2000 report, the Institute of Medicine stated that “the Vietnam veteran cohort ha[d] only recently entered the age range with sufficient incidence for accurate study. Therefore, past studies of association between dioxin (Agent Orange) and diabetes have been hampered by the relatively low prevalence of diabetes and the even lower death rate attributed to it.”

Without an appropriate population to work with, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) had to go off of reports of herbicide-related diabetes in farming and herbicide manufacturing situations. The IOM also referenced an Air Force Health Study (Operation Ranch Hand) in 2000, a study of US chemical workers by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, and a study of Australian veterans who served in Vietnam. With all of these studies considered together, the IOM stated that the “accumulation of positive evidence was suggestive” of an association between exposure to Agent Orange and a diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes.  This standard of limited/suggestive evidence of an association was sufficient for the VA to add Diabetes Mellitus to the list of presumptive conditions.

Today, the large number of Vietnam veterans who have Type 2 diabetes continues to reaffirm the VA’s decision to add this condition to the list. There may not be a cure for this disease, but the least that can be done is recompense the afflicted veterans for the service that caused the condition in the first place.

Author Mary Klements, Hill & Ponton, P.A. Claims Advocate